In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 22 Mar 2003 16:28:40 +0100, "Gisle Vanem"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
giva> Why is OPENSSL_NO_FP_API defined for all MS-DOS targets?
giva> I assume it means "No FILE pointer API". Isn't that situation covered
giva> already by OPENSSL_NO_STDIO?
giva>
giva> In <e_os2.h>:
giva> /* Specials for I/O an exit */
giva> #ifdef OPENSSL_SYS_MSDOS
giva> # define OPENSSL_NO_FP_API
giva>
giva> OPENSSL_NO_FP_API is already defined in <e_os.h> when OPENSSL_NO_STDIO
giva> is defined. So my suggestion is to delete OPENSSL_NO_FP_API from <e_os2.h>.
The point with the change is that some exported header files depend on
OPENSSL_NO_FP_API (for example bio.h, but in total, it's checked in 15
of them). e_os2.h is an public header, e_os.h is not. Therefore, we
need to have that definition in e_os2.h.
If you know a way of getting it better, please tell us.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
