In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:17:02 -0600, "Verdon Walker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
VWalker> I have a patch ready to be submitted which will add NetWare support to
VWalker> OpenSSL 0.9.7. I have tested it with the latest snapshots and everything
VWalker> is looking good. I would like the patch to go into the 0.9.8 branch as
VWalker> well as the 0.9.7 branch, but when I downloaded the latest snapshot
VWalker> (6-10) for 0.9.8 it doesn't compile for Windows (before applying my
VWalker> patch). How should I go about creating a patch file for 0.9.8? Are the
VWalker> snapshots normally stable? or do I just work with what is there even if
VWalker> it doesn't compile? or do I not need to worry about 0.9.8 yet?
Let us at least look at the patch. If the 0.9.7 patch is big or
affects binary compatibility with earlier 0.9.7 versions, the chance
that it will be committed is rather slim.
VWalker> BTW, the code won't compile because it does not find the include file
VWalker> "openssl/store.h" which is referenced by "engine.h"
Ah, yes, that's my project for tursday, to figure out why store.h
isn't copied along with all other public header files...
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
