In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 5 Jul 2003 08:24:45 +0200 (CEST), Fr�d�ric
Giudicelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
groups> That's pretty much what I asked from the beginning, the
groups> possibility to use ERR_set_implementation and to have ERR_FNS
groups> public. But because of ("if (!err_fns)") on
groups> ERR_set_implementation:304, that's just not possible.
I'm sorry, but how exactly does that conditional stop you from giving
ERR_set_implementation() a non-NULL pointer and have that accepted?
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsv�gen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
