In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:01:19 +0200 (METDST), "[EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> That's an OK solution, but what are the feelings towards those
rt> commas? Are those left out on purpose or were they typos?
They were typos, and have already been corrected.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsv�gen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
