> > >'./Configure hpux64-parisc-gcc -m64' work?
> >
> > <snip>
> > nmcmadam:/opt/patches/openssl-0.9.7c> ./Configure hpux64-parisc-gcc -m64
> > ...
> > Configured for hpux64-parisc-gcc.
> > nmcmadam:/opt/patches/openssl-0.9.7c>
> > </snip>
> >
> > Does that help?
> 
> >Not really:-) What happens if you actually run 'make'?
> 
> It fails make (see output below)
> 
> >Does 'gcc -m64'actually work?
> 
> No. (see output below).

Does it mean that your gcc without any options generate ELF64 object
modules then? Because if it does, then original ./config should have
worked and configured for 64-bit build [without even checking for kernel
bit-ness!]. If gcc without extra option doesn't generate ELF64 object
modules, then it's no point to check for kernel bit-ness, *unless* we
know what command line option makes gcc generate different object
modules. So if you *know* that your gcc is capable of generating both
ELF64 and 32-bit object modules, then you should figure out what is the
command line option and tell us. If there is no such option, then
./config does its best as it is now.

> >Are resulting object modules ELF64?
> 
> How can I check it?

Well, it was least exepcted to get such question from somebody who has
suggested to run 'file /stand/vmunix':-) With 'file some.o' of course!

> nmcmadam:/opt/patches/openssl-0.9.7c> ./Configure hpux64-parisc-gcc
> ...
> Configured for hpux64-parisc-gcc.
> 
> "make" finish successfully.

What does `file apps/openssl' print then? A.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to