In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:33:53 +0100, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lutz.Jaenicke> Have you tested this with eNULL? I would expect the new sequence to Lutz.Jaenicke> unconditionally fail with eNULL! Lutz.Jaenicke> Lutz.Jaenicke> I was thinking about Lutz.Jaenicke> if (ctx->cipher_ctx_size) Lutz.Jaenicke> cipher_data = malloc(); Lutz.Jaenicke> else Lutz.Jaenicke> cipher_data = NULL; /* There is no key to store */ Ah, good point. I have now committed a change, as you have probably seen. ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. You don't have to be rich, a $10 donation is appreciated! -- Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsv�gen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
