Rich Salz wrote:
And what OpenSSL calls "PEM" doesn't have that much to do with Privacy
Enhanced Mail...
Doesn't it? What is that, then?
PEM is dead. It died more than a decade ago. OpenSSL used the
boundary format. That's the only thing of PEM that remains. :)
/r$
OpenSSL uses it inconsistently though. As you see, I _just_ pointing
out the problem specifically related with boundary recognition of this
"boundary format". This has nothing to do with the full PEM semantics
as it is given in that RFC, and it has more to do with interoperability,
i.e. treating \n and \r equally [well].
Please, let's end this meaningless discussion: either there is a problem
with boundary recognition (as confirmed by Richard Levitte), or there
isn't.
--
Lev Walkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
