On June 14, 2004 12:00 pm, Kevin Stefanik wrote: > I just realized that we may not have been discussing the same issue. > When I was referring to dynamically or statically linked engines, I was > referring to how the engines were linked to libcrypto. In all cases, > we're discussing a dynamic engine contained in a shared library, so I > think we agree on the problem.
Ah, phew. Zoltan sent some stuff to me, but I'll need to wait a couple of days until I have time to sift through this. However I'm pretty confident the 0.9.7 use of ERR_get_implementation() is bogus. What results have you had (if any) against cvs snapshots? As you've observed, there is a better mechanism in place there and depending on what I find when I get a chance to dig into Zoltan's mail, I may elect to just merge that aspect of the engine code back to 0.9.7 to address the problem. � suivre ... Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
