On Monday 14 June 2004 07:35 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote: > On June 14, 2004 12:00 pm, Kevin Stefanik wrote: > > I just realized that we may not have been discussing the same issue. > > When I was referring to dynamically or statically linked engines, I was > > referring to how the engines were linked to libcrypto. In all cases, > > we're discussing a dynamic engine contained in a shared library, so I > > think we agree on the problem. > > Ah, phew. Zoltan sent some stuff to me, but I'll need to wait a couple of > days until I have time to sift through this. However I'm pretty confident > the 0.9.7 use of ERR_get_implementation() is bogus. What results have you > had (if any) against cvs snapshots? As you've observed, there is a better > mechanism in place there and depending on what I find when I get a chance > to dig into Zoltan's mail, I may elect to just merge that aspect of the > engine code back to 0.9.7 to address the problem. ï suivre ... >
Linking the openssl engine to libcrypto.so shared library for 0.9.8 works fine as far as I've been able to test. Thanks, Kevin ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
