> when using the 64-bit gcc compiler...i get the following on the 'make test'... any > suggestions?
Be more specific. Less we have to guess, better answers you get and faster. Should we start testing all known 64-bit gcc compilers? Note that README explicitly mentions that you're expected to submit 'make report' output. > somebody else posted this question a while back, but i do not see a reply. Also note that README suggests a number of steps prior submitting the bug report, most notably reducing optimization level in order to exclude compiler bugs, which we can't possibly be responsible for. But in either case... > ... if [ "solaris64-sparcv9-gcc" = "Cygwin" ]; ... ./rmdtest Aha! SPARC Solaris... > error calculating RIPEMD160 on '' > got c12836ad0d061da6ccde02fb0b5be87f0c62a4a5 instead of > 9c1185a5c5e9fc54612808977ee8f548b2258d31 If it's gcc 3.x, then I bet on compiler bug. Lower optimization level and see if test passes. Configuring with -DMD32_REG_T=int might do the trick as well... A. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
