On July 28, 2004 06:24 pm, Andy Polyakov wrote: > > Now I use the same engine in both trees (only with different > > filenames) and would like to continue doing so. > > Or is the question if we can *keep* compatibility for all ethernity? > Well, I can't make any promises and I can tell that engine interface is > not exactly my domain/cup of tea. Probably Geoff can answer this > question... A.
Well you can probably do this using precompiler magic - there are engine versioning symbols you could steal for this purpose. Note however that once you and Andy are happy with the arch side of things and we've put this into CVS, there's no point maintaining the cvs version for old versions, nor would there be any point keeping the code on your web-site maintained for >0.9.7, so things could be simpler in both cases. (BTW the same sort of comment applies to the indenting style, for example.) I suggest that you and Andy get happy with the gritty stuff, and then I'll help with the rest. (We should probably at that point also put a contrib link to your site if it's not already there to cover people wanting a version backfitted to 0.9.7.) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
