Good catch. I think +r was favored over =&r for a reason [like bug in initial gcc port, note that the code was written prior Opteron was released], but I've tested now =&r with gcc 3.2 and it's treated correctly. So I throw it in and syncronize HEAD and 0.9.7-stable. Case is dismissed. A.
______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
