appro> 1. I'm reluctant to include bn.h to non-bn code, because it's
appro> nothing but counterintuitive [and is not good in long run].
appro> 2. My standpoint is [still] that pqueue/dtls1 should not have
appro> dependancy on bh.h either.
appro> 3. Using BIGNUM for DTLS purposes is *total* overkill. To back
appro> this up I'm going to suggest alternative, 64-bit neutral pq
appro> code shortly:-)
I agree.
Consider http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=13985 for 0.9.8.
I'd say a change to something completely new in this department should
only be added to the 0.9.8 tree with lots of caution,
The proposed path fixes bugs too:-) BTW, does anybody see bug here:
bitmap <<= (a-b);
BTW, is there any test application? A.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
