Thanks, patch applied.  I will apply the other one as well.

Ticket resolved.

[guest - Wed Jun 22 23:04:09 2005]:

> Here are the patches to the OpenSSL 0.9.8-beta5 Configure script for 
> Stratus VOS.  I've tested them on a Stratus Continuum (PA-RISC) system 
> running VOS 14.7.0ax and on the Stratus V Series V400 system (Intel 
> IA32) running VOS 15.1.0ah.  These changes are sufficient for our PA-
> RISC platform, and they are necessary but not sufficient for the Intel 
> IA32 platform.
> 
> I'm breaking up the changes into VOS-only changes (this patch) and a 
> second patch that VOS IA32 needs but which also affects other 
> platforms.
> 
> The following is an explanation of these changes for the curious.
> 
> I'm dropping support for our "vcc" compiler because it does not 
> currently support 64-bit integers.  If and when it gains such support, 
> I'll restore the lines in Configure.
> 
> I'm dropping the explicit specification of the target platform (gcc "-
> b" argument) so that the spec works with both platforms.  We don't 
> support cross compiling with gcc, so the build has to be run on the 
> proper platform anyway.
> 
> I'm explicitly defining the B_ENDIAN macro to avoid some assumptions 
> in the source code that the Intel IA32 is always Little Endian.  We 
> have created a gcc that implements a Big Endian environment on the 
> IA32; fun stuff.  The second patch for VOS will add the actual checks.
> 
> I've removed the definition of BN_CTX_DEBUG in the "debug" build 
> because we run the self-tests with every build, and if this variable 
> is defined we get more than 2 gigabytes of output from the tests....I 
> think that only the developer/debugger of the bignum package cares 
> about this level of debugging.
> 
> Thanks
> PG
> 


-- 
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to