Здравствуйте, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3 сентября 2005 г. числа в 21:54 Вы мне писали:
DK> Denis Andreevich wrote: >>>>Why you don't use 7-Zip for compressing OpenSSL sources? >>>>Just tar "openssl-0.9.8.tar" size 16 281 600 bytes >>>>bzip2 "openssl-0.9.8.tar.bz2" size 2 611 152 bytes >>>>7zip "openssl-0.9.8.tar.7z" size 2 123 591 bytes >> >> DK> Because the compression gains are relatively minor? >> DK> Because 7zip is relatively unknown? >> DK> Because it isn't bundled with the major Linux distributions yet? >> DK> Because www.7zip.org makes it look like it's a Windows-only app? >> >> DK> Once it's on half the Linux workstations by default >> DK> would be a good time to consider it. >> >> First of all, little size of openssl distribution -> speed up download >> sources from server. I'm use modem and speed really matter for me. DK> Understood. >> 7zip and p7zip distributed under GNU GPL. DK> Understood. >> 7zip and p7zip not Window$-only app. DK> However, www.7zip.org looks very much like a Windows-only site. DK> Impressions matter. >> Please visit http://p7zip.sourceforge.net/ >> and answer to your questions your self DK> I looked at it before I wrote. Didn't help. 7zip still DK> looks like a windows-only app until the main web site DK> for 7zip pays more attention to Unix, and until it's on Linux desktops DK> by default. DK> - Dan Ok... ok... If you do not want use 7zip because it is win-app, but why you don't want use "standard" tool like bzip2? --- С уважением, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Денис. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
