Andy Polyakov wrote: >> Could be. But should it be run automatically >> during make? I guess no... > > No, but I'd like to *see* some test program and I'd like to hear > explicit statement that the implementation passes this test. As you > might recall we have tested AES by encypting with software and > decrypting with engine and then other way around. We need something even > this time:-) A.
FWIW I'm testing it with OpenVPN having OpenSSL-0.9.8+padlock on one end and OpenSSL-0.9.7 without padlock on the other. And of course I'm regularly running those openssl dgst tests with and without engine on some input files. I don't often send untested patches ;-) Michal Ludvig -- * Personal homepage: http://www.logix.cz/michal ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
