Concensus was that the failure is caused by a hardware
deficiency. What's your hardware?
Mostly Sun Ultra 10s, running Solaris 8. I can produce the error on more than
one host, too.
Then it can't be hardware...
platform: solaris-sparcv9-gcc
compiler: gcc -fPIC ...
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0xff1fe914 in bn_sub_words () from /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
0xff1fe914 <bn_sub_words+92>: st %g4, [ %o0 + 8 ]
o0 0xcdff8 843768
o3 0xffffd24b -11701
The key question is how come %o3 managed to advance to negative value.
I'm really baffled how it could happen, when the module was known to
work for *years*. Can you test if
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14621 fixes the problem? A.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
