Gisle Vanem wrote:
"Mike Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 11:26, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Some of the new ts/ files are too long for a 8+3 filesystem.
a ton of files are too long for 8+3 filesystem in the openssl tarball
None of the *.[ch] files. They are all 8+3 unique AFAICS (and that's
pretty unusual these days).
But I need 6.3 for my PDP box!!! <j/k>
Seriously, I first read the request, and from win32's perspective...
ts_rsp_print.c > ts_rsp~1.c
ts_rsp_sign.c > ts_rsp~2.c
ts_rsp_utils.c > ts_rsp~3.c
ts_rsp_verify.c > ts_rsp~4.c
but then I recalled Netware and some others which do truncation by default
and decoration only on a 2nd (and later) name clash, so your request doesn't
seem too unorthodox or troublesome.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
