Is it perhaps time for the project maintainers to author the definative "Why OpenSSL is not GPL Licensed, and why it will not be" (not argumentative diatriabe, just simply stating the facts)? Post this on openssl.org and offer inquiring minds a pointer?
This is getting silly when 30 days can't pass without folks using OpenSSL's dev list to wax Ptoemaic about the virtues of BSD and GPL schemes. Better to let the license warriors find other homes for this neverending debate? Howard Chu wrote:
I think Winsock is an obvious counter-example - it is clearly BSD-derived, and they have no problems modifying it and staying far away from the original source tree.
As a consumer of the Winsock 2.2 MS-enhanced API in the APR compatibility library and Apache httpd, I assure you we thank goodness for that :-) ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
