Steve wrote in thread 'Field attributes of X509_REQ_INFO':

> I see. Well that is probably best fixed within X509_REQ_add_extensions()
> itself by checking to see if the field is NULL and allocating it if
> necessary.

Here's a patch. While looking at the code, I've also checked the other 
functions in x509_req.c. They all seem to either allocate the stack if 
needed or fail gracefully otherwise.

Thanks, Remo
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to