On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:36:07PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>>> Log: >>> New functions CRYPTO_set_idptr_callback(), >>> CRYPTO_get_idptr_callback(), CRYPTO_thread_idptr() for a 'void *' type >>> thread ID, since the 'unsigned long' type of the existing thread ID >>> does not always work well. >> To clarify this, if CRYPTO_get_idptr_callback() is used, is it >> unnecessary to also call CRYPTO_set_id_callback? Yes, exactly. >> Does C9x actually guarantee that you can take the address of errno? > From C99, section 7.5: [...] > And: > 6.5.3.2 Address and indirection operators [...] > I believe you can take the address of errno. Yes, that is what I too was reading from the standard. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
