The failure is due to difference in prototypes of int_rsa_verify in
rsa_locl.h and rsa_sign.c. The patch also eliminates a warning of
similar nature in s_server.c.
Index: apps/s_server.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs-openssl/openssl/apps/s_server.c,v
retrieving revision 1.115
diff -u -r1.115 s_server.c
--- apps/s_server.c 17 Apr 2006 12:22:13 -0000 1.115
+++ apps/s_server.c 5 Sep 2006 14:54:55 -0000
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@
goto out_err;
}
if (s_debug)
- BIO_printf(bio_s_out,"identity_len=%d identity=%s\n",
+ BIO_printf(bio_s_out,"identity_len=%lu identity=%s\n",
identity ? strlen(identity) : 0, identity);
/* here we could lookup the given identity e.g. from a database */
Index: crypto/rsa/rsa_sign.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs-openssl/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_sign.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -r1.27 rsa_sign.c
--- crypto/rsa/rsa_sign.c 5 Sep 2006 08:58:03 -0000 1.27
+++ crypto/rsa/rsa_sign.c 5 Sep 2006 14:54:55 -0000
@@ -144,9 +144,9 @@
}
int int_rsa_verify(int dtype, const unsigned char *m,
- unsigned int m_len,
- unsigned char *rm, unsigned int *prm_len,
- const unsigned char *sigbuf, unsigned int siglen,
+ size_t m_len,
+ unsigned char *rm, size_t *prm_len,
+ const unsigned char *sigbuf, size_t siglen,
RSA *rsa)
{
int i,ret=0,sigtype;
--
Artem Chuprina
RFC2822: <ran{}ran.pp.ru> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
