>For 0.9.9-dev I would prefer making the parameter (and hence the >return type) in the X509_foo_get() functions const but I'm not >sure if we should change this behaviour in 0.9.8-stable. >Comments are welcome.
I think I had experimented with making things const at one point but had concluded that might break things in the manner you describe since macros are implicily always non-const. For the purposes of the LSB exersize, making the change in 0.9.9 with const declarations sounds like a reasonable thing to do, since the timing of LSB probably indicates a 0.9.9 release will be available (and hopefully in distros) before LSB 4.0. Thanks, Tracy Camp > >Cheers, >Nils >______________________________________________________________________ >OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org >Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org >Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
