Thank you very much for the information. --- Erwann ABALEA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bonsoir, > > Hodie VI Id. Iun. MMVII est, durgaprasad jammula > scripsit: > > This question is regarding the extended key usage > > extension implementation which differs from the > > specification [RFC 2459]. > > > > I read RFC 2459 in > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2459.html section > 4.2.1.13 > > Extended key usage field. > > The corresponding paragraph of the RFC3280 (RFC2459 > is obsolete, and > superseded by RFC3280) reads: > > "If the extension is present, then the certificate > MUST only be used > for one of the purposes indicated." > > RFC3280 is much more clear and unambigous than > RFC2459. > > -- > Erwann ABALEA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project > http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List > [email protected] > Automated List Manager > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
