On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 14:52:27 +0200, Frank Büttner wrote: > Kurt Roeckx schrieb: > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:00:37PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > >>> Using the Intel 9.1 compiler on an IA64 system the performance of > >>> AES and (to a lesser extent) other algorithms implemented in > >>> assembly language is less than that using gcc. I've included the > >>> speed output for several of the algorithms below. > >>> > >>> Is this a know issue and is there a workaround other than switching > >>> to gcc? > >> You should compare with the best optimization flags for each compiler. I > >> don't see any of the typical icc optimization flags used, > >> like -ip, -march=pentium4, -msse3, -xP, or whatever is appropriate for your > >> CPU. > > > > I don't think -march=pentium4 is going to work on an IA64, and I have my > > doubts about sse3 too. > > > > Note that IA64 is not an x86_64/amd64/x64. > > > > > > Kurt > > Have you try the last version of the intel compiler(10.0)? >
Not yet, the system I'm building on does not have the 10.0 compilers. However, that is something I intend to try. -- Iain Morgan ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
