> You've suggested approach that mimics .bat-based build, i.e. generating > big flat make-file, while we've chosen to discontinue it in favor of > Unix-like build procedure, i.e. having make traverse source tree for > Makefiles [see development branch]. In other words suggested approach is > not the approach we want/can afford to support. A.
Do you currently support MinGW/cross compile with your new build system? I don't think the specific approach is the important one. The solution is important. The requirement is to build OpenSSL libraries and binaries on none Win32 architecture. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
