Hi, sorry for the late reply, and sorry for the duplicate info : I am not on -dev, and didn't see Kurt's message. Thanks for CC'ing me.
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:28:44 +0100 (CET) "Andy Polyakov via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it's not "few calls that are direct" but *a lot* of calls that become > direct. In other words we agree that -Bsymbolic is not inappropriate and > I intend to dismiss this case as "not our, but for-Debian-to-fix > problem." Naturally with reservation for keeping my eyes open for > possible solution in perlasm. Solution that will work with all supported > platforms but even without -Bsymbolic, just for completeness sake. > Though it will be low prio as we have no plans for stopping using > -Bsymbolic. A. The system in question is indeed a Debian machine -- I should have mentioned that previously. I can confirm that the libcrypto bundled in e.g. FC7 does not contain such relocs (which, since it doesn't seem to be an optimized version, was expected). Kurt, do you wish me to file a bug against the Debian package instead ? Simon ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
