On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 13:39 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > David Woodhouse via RT wrote: > > (Was waiting for the RT to autoreply with a number before I followed up, > > but it doesn't seem to have arrived after half an hour, so I'll send > > anyway. Hopefully the References: header will associate this with the > > previous mail anyway...) > > > > Mailings to rt are moderated. > The requested association was thus performed by the moderation > mechanism :-)
Out of interest, is there a similar magic incantation I could use to influence some 'mechanism' to actually apply the patches? I can understand some reticence on the patch which adds Cisco compatibility for DTLS (#1751) -- I was half expecting to be told there's a better way to do that. But the simple bug fixes which fix an assert() failure (#1703) and prevent it from either dropping misordered packets or receiving garbage when they occur (#1752)... those I kind of expected to go in a little quicker. :) -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intel Corporation ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
