I agree. This is the most interesting thread I have read for a long time.
Can't we spare some list bandwidth even for nitty-gritty things?
/Leif


Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Ger Hobbelt wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Kenneth Robinette
>> <supp...@securenetterm.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> You need to take this discussion offline.
>>>       
>> <snif> Finally something interesting to read and it's mentioned it
>> should go. sigh. Here's two who know their craft, it's even about
>> OpenSSL and it has given me joy these days, just by reading this. This
>> wins over FAQable question posts any day.
>>     
>
> Gerrit -
>
> I agree with you completely.  Some actual nitty-gritty is good to read.
>
> - Michael
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org
>   

Reply via email to