Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:40:36PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
This is from /openssl-SNAP-20090405 on Solaris x86 ver 2.5.1 using
gcc 2.95.3:
Ow! Solaris 2.5.1, and gcc2?
Didn't Sun even finally end all support for Solaris 2.5?
There are trivial differences between Solaris 2.5.1 and the later
Solaris versions. Not enough to cause a build problem. So if
it's busted on 2.5.1 it will be busted on 2.6, 2.7 etc. Plus, that
illegal mnemonic error has happened before and been corrected
before in openssl. Finally, compilation with "no-asm" means NO
ASSEMBLY, NONE, NADA!!! While you might be able to argue
obsolescense on the first compile, the second compile with no-asm
defined shouldn't have errored. Obviously, whoever coded wp-mmx
wasn't paying attention to -DOPENSSL_NO_INLINE_ASM. Not to mention
the larger question of why wp-mmx was even selected - not all Intel
chips HAVE mmx instructions.
It's obviously a bug. Whether it's easy to fix or not I don't know.
But clearly, if OpenSSL is going to decide to stop supporting things
then it should be documented.
OpenSSL 0.9.8j runs fine on this platform.
Ted
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [email protected]
