In message <[email protected]> on Fri, 15 May 2009 09:01:53 -0500 (CDT), [email protected] (Steven M. Schweda) said:
sms> From: Richard Levitte <[email protected]> sms> sms> > [...] sms> > Oh, right, there is ONE thing I can mention already... I'm not going sms> > to change the tests for f$getsyi("CPU") to ones for sms> > f$getsyi("HW_MODEL"), because there are some (VAX) VMS versions out sms> > there that do not support the latter and therefore create failure. sms> sms> I'll admit that I didn't test anything older than VMS V7.3, but: sms> sms> WIMP $ write sys$output f$getsyi( "VERSION") sms> V5.4 sms> WIMP $ write sys$output f$getsyi( "HW_MODEL") sms> 49 sms> sms> V5.4 (circa 1990) is as far back as I can go. How far back do you sms> really expect to go? sms> sms> Wake me when you have a valid complaint. Hmmm, maybe I'm wrong then... It's odd, because back when I decided to use f$getsyi("CPU"), I did hit some problems with "HW_MODEL" and "HW_NAME"... But then, if those two exist in all VMS versions alive today, wouldn't it be even easier to use "HW_NAME"? Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte [email protected] http://richard.levitte.org/ "Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!" -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
