I tested the 20090515 1.0 snapshot on both of the two systems mentioned in the previous posts as well as several other Intel systems. In all of the cases, the AES performance is now in the range I would expact.
Thanks Iain On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 16:14:04 -0700, Iain Morgan wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Thanks. I tried the latest from CVS this morning and it fixed the Athlon > 64 issue but not the Xeon one. To play it safe, I'll test the snaphost > tomorrow on both systems and let you know the results. > > > Iain > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 14:30:08 -0500, Andy Polyakov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > For the Athlon64 system, I get the following: > > > > > > $ gcc -o cpuid cpuid.c > > > > Thanks for feedback. Recent commits refine shared cache detection logic > > and should provide "usual" large block performance on AMD and Core2. > > Verify tomorrow snapshot or patch according to > > http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=18161. A. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > > Development Mailing List [email protected] > > Automated List Manager [email protected] > > -- > Iain Morgan -- Iain Morgan ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
