please forward your message to [email protected] so it ends up with a ticket # in the OpenSSL issue tracker and folks (Dr. Henson most probably ;-) ) see it pop up on their radar and can incorporate it in CVS when their time allows. patches posted to dev@ or user@ tend to get lost in the mysts if time quite quickly. Thanks and take care,
Ger Hobbelt On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Bayram Kurumahmut<[email protected]> wrote: > > I think there is a confusion about the use of HAVE_FORK definition in the > apps/speed.c file. > > It seems that although I haven't got a fork() function on my system > (therefore I haven't got a HAVE_FORK def too after app ./configure scripts), > I see that HAVE_FORK is defined due to the following lines: > > #if !defined(OPENSSL_SYS_VMS) && !defined(OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS) && > !defined(OPENSSL_SYS_MACINTOSH_CLASSIC) && !defined(OPENSSL_SYS_OS2) && > !defined(OPENSSL_SYS_NETWARE) > # define HAVE_FORK 1 > #endif > > As you know (I stated above also), HAVE_FORK is a definition produced after > a ./configure script in config.h files. Therefore, apps should rely on a > different #define in their local usage. To achieve this, I replaced > HAVE_FORK usage with NO_FORK in the patch. It doesn't hurt any code flow. > > Thanks, > Bayram -- Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards, Ger Hobbelt -------------------------------------------------- web: http://www.hobbelt.com/ http://www.hebbut.net/ mail: [email protected] mobile: +31-6-11 120 978 -------------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
