Kyle Hamilton wrote: > > In addition, Intel has been playing nice and getting its code in the > openssl distribution, as a set of patches that were integrated not too > long ago. Nobody has submitted such a patch for the Geode to my > knowledge (I'm not god of the request tracker, but most mails sent to > [email protected] are forwarded to the -dev list; I've not seen any patches > come in). (i.e.: Intel is doing strategic positioning that AMD is not.)
So what is the word on the OpenSSL patches to extend driver support for the T2000/T1000 class CPU's, since Intel's patches are being rapidly committed? What is the position on Sun's patches? Is this for code style? Lack of review? Lack of time to commit? I'd like to see the already-written Sparc patched incorporated already, maintaining two forks is a pain. If I can be of help, I would. Bill ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
