The ECDSA_do function seems working: the verification process failed when I changed a bit in the string of the verify process.
Yep, the verify process should be slower. David Jacobson-3 wrote: > > > It doesn't sound possible. In fact, ECDSA verify has two point > multiplications vs. one for ECDSA sign. So it should be slower. But > here is a technique that will help resolve the issue. Change one byte > of the message, and try to verify. If it verifies successfully, you > know it is not working. > > -- David Jacobson > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ECDSA_do_verify%28%29-tp26074867p26086579.html Sent from the OpenSSL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
