On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 18:41 +0100, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: > Or two milliard, in which case one doesn't even have to switch to > unsigned. Please test http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19095. I opted > for limiting loops at 2^31, because extending to 64-bit is problematic, > as it implies different types on different platforms [not to mention > not-really-portable conversion specifiers for 64-bit types]. I didn't > opt for 2^32, because 2^31 provides as adequate accuracy in lesser > changes. A.
Makes sense; thanks. I don't have access to hardware right now -- especially with Windows on it, but I'll get someone to test. -- dwmw2 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
