> [[email protected] - Mon Apr 26 11:04:29 2010]: > > > You're right. The loop was written in the assumption that the control > variable in the for loop can become -1. Since the variable type was > changed to unsigned long, that didn't work anymore and my fix also > didn't correct that. Here's an updated version. >
The initial patch was changed because it didn't compile without warnings with the stricter developer compiler options and my "fix" unfortunately broke it. Can you check there aren't any warnings with the revised patch? On OpenSSL 1.0.0 you can use the --strict-warnings option to Configure. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
