Darryl Miles <[email protected]> wrote on 2010/05/18 12:13:38: > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Sure, but this is the BIO interface and I am at loss on how to do this > > with BIO. It seems like I am stuck somewhere inside BIO and it keeps > > retrying. > > From my understanding, your patches are against the "default BIO > implementations for sockets" not against the BIO interface per se.
Yes > > You did not confirm if you had the sockets in non-blocking mode or not > (at the time you observed the condition for which the patch improved). As far as I can tell it is in non blocking mode. Can one have EAGAIN otherwise? > > Also confirm: > * Your platform (and OS version) Linux 2.4 and 2.6, cross compiled from x86 to PowerPC > * Your OpenSSL library version and Very old, 0.9.7d. About to upgrade and that when I remembered the old patch > * If the library was compiled yourself or was supplied by a vendor (if > a vendor the version information they provide for it). Complied by myself with cross gcc 3.4.6 > > > Writing a simple/small test case should not be an issue, the same > application which can be used for server or client end maybe with > different command line options. Not for me, The SLL stuff is embedded here and there in the webserver we use (GoAhead) and I don't know enough openSLL to write one. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
