On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 22:07 +0000, Lou Picciano wrote: > Do you have 'reservations' about the openssl gang's inclinations to > incorporate these changes?
What, even the trivial one-liner in RT#2045 that actually makes it work in HEAD for normal applications instead of being entirely pointless, which has been completely ignored since I submitted it in September? No comment. Btw, your mail program is misbehaving -- your message has broken the threading because it claims to be a reply to a message which was never seen on this list: <92378209.81620.1278281180571.javamail.r...@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> -- dwmw2 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
