You must run './config', at the very least.

-Kyle H

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:54 AM, kunal patel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Giles,
>
> The reason for undefined references (below is just an example I have
> encountered alot of them) is the function definitions are missing from
> 0.9.8n version. I compared the source code of 0.9.8g and 0.9.8n (for e.g.,
> comparing crypto/buffer/buffer.c) BUF_strlcpy is removed from there but
> functions are still using it..
>
> I am using standard gnu compiler. There is no special settings for openssl.
> I would like to know if any such settings are required..
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kunal
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Gilles Espinasse <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: kunal patel
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:28 AM
>> Subject: Picking up right openssl version for RFC 5746 support
>>
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > I am trying to upgrade the openssl library for my work. Currently, I
>> > have
>> 0.9.8g. I am looking
>> > for appropriate library version which has the fix for RFC 5746. I cannot
>> move to 1.0.0
>> > version right now. Which stable version should I pick up ?
>> > I tried with 0.9.8n but facing lot of compile issues with it. For e.g.,
>> > shr_crypto_ca.o: In function `ASN1_TIME_to_generalizedtime':
>> > : undefined reference to `BUF_strlcpy'
>> >
>> You fail to say what your environment is and show how you configured the
>> compilation.
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
>> Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
>> Automated List Manager                           [email protected]
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [email protected]

Reply via email to