Hello Richard, Thank you for taking the time to move this issue forward.
> There are things missing in the patch, such as actually using /POINTER_SIZE with the compiling steps The pointer size is set from the makevms.com file with the following line: $ WRITE H_FILE "#define CFLAGS ""/pointer_size=''POINTER_SIZE'"" /* compiler flags */" > Unfortunately, I currently only have Alphas to test on. I hope someone else > can test on other platforms. I have tested the patch on IA64 > built on: 7-DEC-2010 11:34:44.59 > platform: VMS IA64 V8.3 > compiler: /pointer_size=32 but have access to VAX (@polarhome.com), Alpha and IA64 as well. Regards, Z -----Original Message----- From: Richard Levitte via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] Sent: den 14 december 2010 11:01 To: Arpadffy Zoltan Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: [openssl.org #2393] [PATCH] 32/64 bit pointer_size choice in the VMS build I've started on it. There are things missing in the patch, such as actually using /POINTER_SIZE with the compiling steps, but otherwise it seems fairly sound. I'll work the rest out. Unfortunately, I currently only have Alphas to test on. I hope someone else can test on pther platforms. > [zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se - Tue Dec 14 05:44:53 2010]: > > Hello > > I'm sending again to RT - otherwise it might be forgotten. > I would appreciate any comment. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Z > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arpadffy Zoltan [mailto:zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se] > Sent: den 7 december 2010 12:54 > To: Richard Levitte; openssl-dev@openssl.org > Subject: RE: buid STABLE-SNAP-20101124 on platform: VMS IA64 V8.3 > > Hello Richard, > > I am sorry for delay, but I am quite busy nowadays. > > Zoltan.Arpadffy> Zoltan.Arpadffy> ...I am dreaming of the possibility > to choose between the 64 and the 32 bit version build and reuse this > "not-used option" in MAKEVMS.COM > Zoltan.Arpadffy> Zoltan.Arpadffy> During the summer I have submitted a > patch for this "feature"... wonder is there any chance for this code > to be merged in? > Zoltan.Arpadffy> > Zoltan.Arpadffy> Richard Levitte> I recall discussing it, because it > seemed to be a no-op... but I can't recall getting to an answer (and > I'll admit not being a good > Zoltan.Arpadffy> participant in that discussion). > Zoltan.Arpadffy> > Zoltan.Arpadffy> This would be very useful as there are still users > that link against 32 bit libraries for some reasons. > Zoltan.Arpadffy> From other side the current 64 bits build stays as a > default and you would not see any difference if the 32 bit parameter > is not explicitly used. > Zoltan.Arpadffy> > Zoltan.Arpadffy> I'll prepare a patch against STABLE-SNAP-20101124 and > when I'm ready I'll submit it again. > > Richard Levitte> I'll have a look at it when I get it :-) > > Please, review the attached patch (against STABLE-SNAP-20101124). > > Changes is short: > USAGE: @MAKEVMS.COM [Target] <Pointer size> <Debug option> > <Compiler> > Like @MAKEVMS.COM ALL > Defaults: Pointer size = 64 (VAX 32) Debug option= NODEBUG > > Libraries with pointer_size=32 has a 32 sufix in the name > (LIBCRYPTO32, LIBSSL32) > pointer_size=64 is the default (except on VAX) and produces standard > libraries (LIBCRYPTO, LIBSSL) > > It works well on my system. > > ALL TESTS SUCCESSFUL. > OpenSSL 1.0.1-dev xx XXX xxxx > built on: 7-DEC-2010 11:34:44.59 > platform: VMS IA64 V8.3 > options: bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(ptr,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) > idea(int) blowfish(idx) > compiler: /pointer_size=32 > OPENSSLDIR: N/A > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Z > > > > > > > > > -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
