On Monday, December 20, 2010 08:02:39 pm [email protected] via RT wrote: -page of the "openssl x509" command line tool for details. The old behaviour +page of the "openssl x509" commandline tool for details. The old behaviour
I think either "command line" or "commandline" is OK, but the former is better. -Two slightly different techniques were developed to support this, one used by +Two slighly different techniques were developed to support this, one used by The original was correctly, slighly is incorrect. -instruction extensions. See accompanying INSTALL file and +instruction extentions. See accompanying INSTALL file and extensions was correct, extentions is incorrect. -simply bad code generated by a buggy component in tool chain or deficiency +simply bad code generated by a buggy component in toolchain or deficiency I think either "tool chain" or "toolchain" is OK, but the former is probably slightly better. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
