From: Arpadffy Zoltan <zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se> > I am sorry, I could not test your changes yet - I'll do it, hopefully, duri= > ng this week. > ...but to be honest, I am more curious what is Richard's opinion about your= > changes.
I'm curious about anyone's opinion, but you know as much as I do. Please let me know if you see any problems. (By the way, did you have any actual need for the 64-bit-pointer stuff, or was that work done mostly for fun?) Today's change set includes different names for the various "[...]install.com" procedures, and better clean-up of the logical names which each one defines. http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s2d.zip Ideally, with these changes, no one should find any WRK_* logical names left defined after running any of these procedures. Also, with the new, unique procedure names, the (new) "@@@ whatever.com" messages should provide some useful information. I think that I've exhausted my to-do list, so, unless I find some new problems, I may be quiet for a while. My VAX is still working on a Perl build (which I was hoping to use for OpenSSL testing), so I still haven't tried the latest version of everything there. (But what could go wrong?) I tried building the original and modified 1.0.0d code on an HP-UX (11.31 ia64) system, and I didn't see any significant differences in the test results. So, either those command-line argc+argv changes were all good, or else the tests are insufficient to show the new problems. Complaints are always welcome, of course. SMS. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org