On 4/13/2011 5:42 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> Open SSL dev team,
>  
> It seems like in releases after OpenSSL 0.9.8l (the ones that contained the 
> fix for cve
> 2009-3555),  client initiated "secure/safe" renegotiationw was never 
> re-enabled by
> default, judging by how Apache behaves. 

Since you are asking a /user/ question about *Apache*, the dev@ list of openssl
seems like a really silly place to start ;-)

But I've kicked your question over to the Apache httpd dev list to inquire about
the state of the mod_ssl/CVE-2009-3555 code.  I reproduced with 0.9.8o and 
2.2.17
with a 0.9.8o client.

Perhaps the only relevant *OpenSSL* question is; does 'R' attempt a 'new style'
renegotiation, or only a classic/legacy renegotiation?  If that's the case (and
you want it to work, in spite of risks), and this is the behavior you want to 
allow,
there's a directive for that;

  http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_ssl.html#sslinsecurerenegotiation

but let's drop httpd discussion from this thread, if you want to follow up,
us...@httpd.apache.org is probably the list you wanted in the first place.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to