> I'm somewhat opposed to the originally > suggested idea of intermediate buffering, because there is no good way > of knowing what's optimal and so you end up wasting memory [especially > in MT application].
Clarification. "Originally suggested idea of intermediate buffering" does not refer to intermediate buffering in "crash page" case (suggestion is to share *one* buffer among all threads and serialize access to it). It refers to original idea of accumulating data in EVP context so that it can be processed in one shot. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
