On Jan 23, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012, Paul Hoffman wrote: > >> Greetings. I will likely be using features that only appear in "this new >> version" of OpenSSL in a project. There has been a question about whether >> the new features will really be in 1.0.1, because they are very clearly not >> in 1.0.0. >> > > Which new features specifically? There will be many in 1.0.1 such as TLS v1.2 > support.
That's a good start, yes. :-) Supporting a new version of TLS seems like a good reason to call this a new version of OpenSSL. >> Was there a discussion of the decision to add significant features but not >> go to 1.1? I'd like to review it before advocating for 1.1. (And, no, I am >> quite sure it is not too late to choose "1.1" for "this new version" if the >> community wants to do so during the beta testing.) >> > > There was a discussion of the new versioning scheme some time ago. I'm sure there was, but I can't find it easily in the archive. If "some time ago" means "past our memory boundary", this would be a good time to revive the discussion. If it means "it was discussed and finalized", it would be good to know what that final decision was. --Paul Hoffman ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
