I originally thought my problem was with ssh, so that is what I was looking it, after I finally found that the problem was with the ssl, I sent the email to you. After that I did some more testing and found that by using the no-asm flag during the config everything worked normally.
I guess my point is that the ssl version 1.0.0h didn't exhibit the problem, a change in between the 1.0.0h and 1.0.1b did, So at this point I was just wanting to make you aware of the problem because I haven't had any problems with building openssl in quite some time. thanks for your reply. Dean Carter On 05/11/2012 06:23 AM, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: >> I built both a aix 5.2 / 32 bit version of openssl 1.0.1b and a aix 6.1 >> / 64 bit version. I also did a build of the latest openssh. When >> testing the 32 bit openssh I had some problems that seem to come from >> running ssh-keygen. >> >> The aix 6.1 / 64 bit version runs fine with out problems >> >> sox:/opt/freeware/src/packages/SOURCES/openssl-1.0.1b> ssh -V >> OpenSSH_6.0p1, OpenSSL 1.0.1b 26 Apr 2012 >> >> I run make test and the 64 bit version completes with ALL TESTS SUCCESSFUL, >> >> but the 32 bit version gets to this section of the test: >> >> >> Generate and certify a test certificate >> >> make a certificate request using 'req' >> rsa >> Generating a 2048 bit RSA private key >> ................................................................................................. >> >> from here it seems to go into an endless loop. > Quoting SUPPORT section in README: > > "If you have any problems with OpenSSL then please take the following > steps first: > > - Download the current snapshot from ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/ > to see if the problem has already been addressed > - Remove ASM versions of libraries > - Remove compiler optimisation flags > " > > It's probably appropriate to perform steps in reverse, i.e. start with > removing optimization flags. Well, depending on defaults it might be > appropriate to modify optimization flag to reduce optimization level, > rather than to just remove, i.e. -O1, then -O0. If dropping optimization > level helps, then it's something to discuss with IBM, not OpenSSL... > > >
<<inline: DCarter.vcf>>
