On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Andy Polyakov <ap...@openssl.org> wrote: >> The point of these changes is to reduce the skew between versions. >> They are not "random". > > > Consider my > http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/x86cpuid.pl&v1=1.24&v2=1.25. > > What is the criteria for two changes being propagated downwards and one > reverted? Random.
It was a mistake. Sorry. > Have closer look at your > http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/modes/gcm128.c&v1=1.28&v2=1.29 > > What is the criteria for changing +- line but not two lines above? Random. It was the line that was different between the two versions. I'm sorry I didn't notice that GHASH is a badly written macro and so I should've chosen the other one (or fixed the macro, I guess). ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
