> > > You make it sound like the fact that c_d is a stack array is an excuse > for doing wrong:-) I mean it's clearly a compiler bug and reasoning as > above does not make it understandable/justifiable/excusable. Formally > it's not OpenSSL bug and shouldn't be reported as one...
I thought I'd made it quite clear that it was a compiler bug, but since a single line of code can "fix" it in my case, I was hoping it wouldn't be too much trouble... I don't think Microsoft is going to be very responsive to changing some old DDK compiler, after all... and I'm stuck with it :( The only alternative would be to go back to the 0.9.x series of OpenSSL where the file in question is different, or maintain my own patch set (I do like your alternate fix). If it's not to be fixed because it's actually a compiler bug then please simply close the bug report. Thanks for looking at it. Paul
You make it sound like the fact that c_d is a stack array is an excuse
for doing wrong:-) I mean it's clearly a compiler bug and reasoning as
above does not make it understandable/justifiable/excusable. Formally
it's not OpenSSL bug and shouldn't be reported as one...
?
I thought I'd made it quite clear that it was a compiler bug, but since a single line of code can "fix" it in my case, I was hoping it wouldn't be too much trouble...
I don't think Microsoft is going to be very responsive to changing some old DDK compiler, after all... and I'm stuck with it :( ?The only alternative would be to go back to the 0.9.x series of OpenSSL where the file in question is different, or maintain my own patch set (I do like your alternate fix).
If it's not to be fixed because it's actually a compiler bug then please simply close the bug report.?
Thanks for looking at it.
Paul
