> I tested 2 sample test explained in the FIPS > 180-2 and 180-3 documents with OpenSSL 1.0.1 document and test output > matched in both the cases. But the CH was different in FIPS 180-2 > than FIPS 180-3. So I was wondering how output can be same > irrespective of CH difference.
There is no way for test to pass with (x&y)^(x&z). But I'm not going to try to figure out why you assert that your test passed, it's something for you to dig into. Bottom line is that OpenSSL is compliant with *real* FIPS180-2, as well as 3 and relevant parts of 4. > I was not aware the document is > corrupted. Nobody was. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
